WHAT SINGLE PAYER ISN’T
Inoculate yourself against misleading ads put out by groups with vested interests in the status quo--those who do not want to see the billions of dollars they currently divert to their corporations redirected to provide health care. Improved Medicare For All is...
● NOT the Public Option
● NOT Medicare for Some
● NOT Medicare Advantage
● NOT Managed Care (HMOs, ACOs)
● NOT “Socialized Medicine”
● NOT “Government-run.”
These are terms people try to associate with Single Payer, Medicare for All.The first four above—the Public Option, Medicare Advantage, Medicare for Some, or forms of “managed care” such as Health Maintenance Organizations (HMO) and Accountable Care Organizations (ACO)—are alternative plans that claim to be “glide paths to Single Payer, Medicare for All.” They may help some individuals, but end up being much more expensive for us taxpayers than expanded Medicare for All.THEY ARE NOT CREDIBLE COMPONENTS OF RESPONSIBLE SINGLE PAYER LEGISLATION.
The last two phrases--Socialized Medicine and Government-run program—are “hot-button” terms like “one-size fits all” that DO NOT DESCRIBE SINGLE PAYER.Despite being repeated often by proponents of the status quo (and opponents of meaningful reform and cost containment, they have no basis in fact. THEY HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH CURRENT U.S. PROPOSALS FOR SINGLE PAYER, MEDICARE FOR ALL.
Single Payer/ improved Medicare for All is a program to relieve what the Campaign for New York Health calls
https://www.nyhcampaign.org/(scroll down for PIISD animation)
Here we have gathered articles about Single Payer disinformation—whose goal is to sink proposals for significant health care reform and to prolong the Private Insurance Induced Stress Disorder (PIISD) many of us are experiencing. Opponents may say they are for “reform,” but reforms that maintain the abusive for-profit practices of the current corporate insurance industry will not be sustainable.
Watch out for MYTHs and MISCONCEPTIONS, disinformation, and outright lies. See the playlist for “muddying the waters” with misinformation about Single Payer, Medicare for All. Watch out for Astroturf “Grassroots Organizations” in favor of corporate insurance, that look independent, but are bankrolled by corporate insurance.
MYTHS AND MISCONCEPTIONS
LEARN to DISTINGUISH FACTS from MYTHS
DON’T FALL FOR DECEPTIVE, MISLEADING LANGUAGE! We propose these materials to help you inoculate yourself against the misinformation being put forward by a group called “Partnership for the Future of American Healthcare” – a group of insurance companies, pharmaceuticals, hospital administrator groups, medical device makers, chambers of commerce, and others with HUGE VESTED INTERESTS in a status quo that funnels HUGE PROFITS into THEIR POCKETS.
● Powerpoint on “Improved Medicare for All Myths and Facts” by LWV-NWMC, AZ, with the talk script to go with it.
● “Fact Check on Claims by Opponents of Medicare for All”, Oct. 2019. Dr. John Geyman warns that “Corporate stakeholders and their lobbyists are pulling out all the stops in their own defense.” He outlines some of their false claims and counters them with evidence-based responses.” Read more..
FALSE CLAIMS VS. EVIDENCE-BASED RESPONSES
Here are persistent “one liners” from industry ads that are false.
People Love Their Private Insurance
“Does Anyone Really Love Their Private Insurance?” by Rachel Madley, Columbia Univ. medical student in the New York Times, 9-2019. She says “I am alive today not because of insurance companies, but despite them.” Don McCanne of PNHP introduces Madley’s article and provides commentary in his “Quote of the Day.”Read more.. (See also, an example “unlovable private insurance” below under monopoly pricing.)
Canadians Come to the U.S. for Health Care
The unsuccessful search for data to support this persistent myth shows that the numbers of Canadians who come to the U.S. expressly for medical care (i.e. not snowbirds) is “a tip without an iceberg.”
Read “Phantoms in the Snow,” a study undertaken to investigate the evidence for the claim that “refugees” of Canada’s single-payer system routinely come across the border seeking necessary medical care not available at home in a timely manner. In fact, the researchers found the number of such refugees to be infinitesimally small. Read more in this summary or the full report.
Medicare for All will be “One-Size Fits-All.” It Will Take Away our Choice of Doctors and Hospitals.
What “choice” do you want? Do you want a choice of insurance plans or choice of health care providers and hospitals?
Wouldn’t you want a “one-size-that-actually-fits-all” plan--one that covers ALL your health care needs, as well as everyone else's, and costs less, OR do you want a choice between pamphlets and more pamphlets describing complex plans where you pray the one you gamble on will cover whatever needs you might have that year and will minimize your vulnerability to “surprise medical bills”?
By eliminating insurance companies’ limited “networks” of providers, Medicare for All would give you the freedom to keep your doctors or find new ones. You will no longer have to choose which insurance middleman you want to stand between you and your doctor. You would no longer have to choose between a multitude of complex, inferior plans which come at a higher price and offer less than Medicare for All. Under Single payer/Medicare for All, one plan will cover all your medically necessary care and will cover you regardless of where you are in the U.S. It will also cover everyone else around you so you will be less exposed to infection.
Free Markets are Best for Health Care
A 1963 study by Kenneth Arrow in the American Economic Review is the classic reference refuting this notion. Accessible at
Rather, in today’s climate, “Your Health Care is a Business Opportunity.” See article in Health over Profits newsletter Jan 2019. In it, an emergency room doctor asks the question, “People are afraid of ‘government health care’? Really, are you afraid of Medicare? I’m afraid of Wall Street corporate health and Big Pharma. I see every day the harm they wreak on our innocent [patients].”Read more ..
“Free Market Fails on Health Care: We Need Medicare for All.” USA Today, July 2019. Businessman and lawmaker David Steil says, “It's time to accept that the free market doesn't work for health care. Patients can't do comparison shopping from the back of an ambulance.”Read more..
The Transition Needs to be Slow.
Medicare was implemented in just one year. President Johnson signed the bill on July 30, 1965. It was fully implemented by July 1, 1966 with 19 million individuals
enrolled. Read more about “Medicare Milestones 1937-2015”… https://www.cms.gov/About-CMS/Agency-Information/History/Downloads/Medicare-and-Medicaid-Milestones-1937-2015.pdf
“The Leap to Single Payer: What Taiwan Can Teach.” NY Times, Dec. 2017. Taiwan’s ambition showed what’s possible. It took ﬁve years of planning and two years of legislative efforts to accomplish its complete transformation [to Single Payer].Read more...
(Note that in the COVID-19 pandemic, Taiwan, as of “35 days after the first 100 cases,” had the quickest and most effective response of all the countries in the world reported on by Johns Hopkins’ Center for Systems Science and Engineering. See more at these stunning interactive graphs at http://91-divoc.com/pages/covid-visualization/.
The Public Option is an Affordable Alternative to Medicare for All. It is a Glide-path to Medicare for All.
”The Public Option is a Poison Pill” by D. Himmelstein & S. Woolhandler, Oct 21, 2019, The Nation.Some Presidential candidates have been pushing it as a free-choice version of Medicare forAll. These doctors say, “That’s good rhetoric but bad policy.”….Read more..
SO-CALLED ALTERNATIVES CLAIMING TO BE
“STEPS TOWARD” MEDICARE FOR ALL
● Comparison Chart for Single Payer versus the Public Option with respect to choice, feasibility, cost control, progressive financing, etc.
● Kaiser Family Fund (KFF): Where Democratic Candidates stand on Healthcare Reform and Prescription Drug Prices (Biden and Sanders)
● KFF’s comparison tool (updated in May 2019) encompasses 10 bills introduced in the 116th Congress and provides both a narrative comparison in an overview and issue brief https://www.kff.org/medicare/issue-brief/medicare-for-all-and-public-plan-buy-in-proposals-overview-and-key-issues/and an interactive side-by-side comparison tool that permits viewers to create their own comparisons.. https://www.kff.org/interactive/compare-medicare-for-all-public-plan-proposals/
● “Three Reasons doctors want Medicare for All, not a Public Option” (Mar 4, 2020). S. Sriram, MD, explains why, as a physician who cares for patients and families struggling with our current health care “system,” he does not see the Public Option as a viable alternative. Read more..
● Kip Sullivan, lawyer and Single Payer activist from Health Care for All Minnesota, explains how some bills that are labeled “single payer” or “Medicare for all” by their authors are missing important cost-containment measures. In this article, from May 2019, he shows how Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs, a new version of traditional Health Maintenance Organizations or HMOs) incorporate private insurance companies and they have provided no significant savings. Read more…
Remember as you read about the alternatives to Medicare for All that any plan that leaves insurance companies in place to perpetuate the abuses they have evolved over the last 25 years has lost the fight for cost containment. The Affordable Care Act of 2010 is one example of a reform whose cost-containment measures were postponed or eliminated by its opponents before they could be implemented.
ABUSES OF THE CORPORATE HEALTH INDUSTRY –
“PROFIT OVER HEALTH” (non-exhaustive list)
A whole Facebook account devoted to putting private insurers’ bad behavior on display.https://www.facebook.com/abolishprivatehealthinsurance/
A bigger website, from David Belk, MD, explores in great detail how what would in other contexts be considered collusion and price fixing are standard practice in the health care industry and have over 20 years “exploded healthcare costs” in the United States.” Read more... https://truecostofhealthcare.org/
“Healthcare Claims Processing” by Henry Broeska (June 2019) is a grim reminder of the non-medical expenses built into the U.S. system, adding 30% or more to our every health care expenditure. Broeska illustrates the crushing weight of administrative waste seen throughout the American insurance “non-system” in two contrasting “flow-charts.” Read more..
Surprise Medical Billing - Has this happened to you, or someone you know? You’ve checked that the hospital you’re going to for your operation is “in-network,” you’ve cleared it ahead of time with the insurance company, but one part of the operation (for example, your doctor is assisted by another doctor who installs a valve during open-heart surgery). This is a doctor you have not met and know nothing about--until you receive the bill from an “out-of-network” provider. See commentary from Kaiser Family Foundation.Read more…
If you’re lucky, it’s just a close call, as in this New York Times article, “My $145,000 Surprise Medical Bill.” The author says, “My brief glimpse into the financial abyss taught me about the American health care system--one bill could wipe us out.” Her bill was an error that she fought successfully to have corrected,but medical bankruptcy is common in the U.S. and nowhere else in the world.Read more..
Since 2013, it’s only gotten worse. Business Insider(June 2019) reports that medical bankruptcy was up to 67%.
Note: There is no surprise billing in Medicare for All -- 1) no networks, so you can’t be “out of network,”2) transparent pricing, 3) and a democratic process required for raising rates.
Monopoly Pricing. “Monopoly Basics: Hospitals & Monopoly.” Open Markets Institute identifies hospital monopolies in almost every US market driven by profit not medical necessity. Prices rise and safety-net hospitals are disappearing. Read more…
Here are two all-too-common examples of abusive pricing gathered by a Local League member.
Her friend reports this instance of OVERCHARGING: Although some insurers will pay for needed emergency care at the closest hospital—even if it is out of network...the hospital and the insurer may not agree on a reasonable price.” If the insurer thinks the hospital is charging too much, and the hospital won’t budge, the bill goes to us--the patient.
In April of last year, this friend thought he was dying. A heart attack had pinned him to the floor of his bedroom. Luckily, his neighbor took him to a Medical Center nearby, where he was successfully treated. Weeks later, he received a bill from the hospital for almost $109,000. The hospital was out of network on his insurance, and Aetna had only paid about $56,000 of the total of $165,000 bill for his treatment.
Here he was, trying to recover, but spending hours on the phone fighting to get the insurance company to cover what was in his contract with them. Ultimately, the local TV station got involved and found that the hospital was over-charging and the charge was greatly reduced.
Why did the hospital finally agree to cover the more than $100,000 cost? Was it purely because of the bad image caused by media coverage? Or is it possible that the charge was so high because they can usually get away with it, but they happened to get caught this time?
In this tragic example, we can see the anguish caused by the callous for-profit hospitals that have replaced so many of our safety-net hospitals
Privatizing Medicare Under the Radar, with so-called Medicare “Advantage.” Marc Sapir, MD, shows in a short powerpoint how Medicare Advantage plans let private insurers game the Medicare system by “upcoding” and other fraudulent practices, and then leave taxpayers to pay for the added expenses.Read more..
Huge Profits Off of Older Americans.” According to Wendell Potter, Oct. 2018, “Medicare Advantage plans are the health insurance industry’s cash cow.”Read more..
“Medicare Advantage Dangers”, by Health Over Profits (HOPE) national organization, ttp://healthoverprofit.org/medicare-advantage-dangers/
RECIPES for DISINFORMATION
These articles provide a template for deliberately misleading the public on the arguments about Single Payer Health Care Reform. They were devised by people who are FINANCED by people and corporations with BIG VESTED INTERESTS in the status quo. Advocates need to inoculate themselves and their audiences against these arguments.
● From anti-Medicare for All PR genius Frank Luntz, chief architect against the Affordable Care Act (and prior reforms).
● From former CIGNA PR VP, Wendell Potter, on inventing “choice” for Health Care Industry (before he left the corporations and became a voice for Medicare for All).
● Explanation of Partnership for Future of America’s HC--methods and more details on what they stand to lose.
● New York Times Mar 2020: “How to Threaten a Political Movement 30 Seconds at a Time”
Congressional Budget Office May 2019“Key Design Components and Considerations for Establishing a Single Payer Health Care System.” In the estimation of the HCR4US network, this document shows how easy it is to mix misinformation in with true statements to give the misinformation the “air” of truth. The explanations may sound clear, and readers may find the outline of the issue they provide to be helpful. However, persistent treatment of assumptions as facts end up distorting the picture. [We have inserted comments to point out some of the most egregious mis-statements. See for yourself what you think.]
Astroturf “Grassroots” Organizations
These are industry created and supported “movements” that purport to represent the insured, but in fact are mouthpieces for the INSURERS. For example, Coalition for Medicare
Choices https://medicarechoices.org/ This group promotes Medicare Advantage, which is a more expensive solution that delivers fewer benefits to fewer people than Improved Medicare for All and is a likely obstacle to the establishment of a better system. The website lists about 35 health organization partners, which seem legitimate, but at the bottom, in fine print, we see “Powered by ahip.org” America’s Health Insurance Plans.”