Resources to act by November 10th and 17th
- Understand the Issue
- How to Locate and Contact your Board Supervisor
- Letter Template for Quick Action
We urge to contact your County Supervisor to revise Draft Ordinance 30.2 by lowering the $25,000 contribution cap. The ordinance will be on the Board's agenda on November 10th and November 17th. Contact your Board Supervisor here.
Understand the Issue: Limit Campaign Contributions in SLOCO Elections
For decades, the LWV has supported campaign finance practices that combat undue influence, allow candidates to compete more equitably for public office and promote citizen participation in politics. The LWV SLOCO recently learned that the SLO County Board of Supervisors was proposing the approval of a new ordinance that would undermine those objectives.
In 2019, the CA Legislature amended the Political Reform Act of 1974 a second time with AB 571 to further curtail campaign finance corruption and undue influence of big money in campaigns. Effective January 1, 2021, AB 571 imposes contribution limitations of $4,700 per person on local elective offices in jurisdictions that have not enacted their own contribution limits. In response, the SLO County Board of Supervisors proposed COUNTY ORDINANCE 30.2 on October 20, 2020. The Board set the cap on campaign contributions at $25,000 per person — more than 5 times the limit set by the State’s Political Reform Act. The county ordinance applies to 10 elective county offices: the Board of Supervisors, County Assessor, District Attorney, Auditor-Controller-Treasurer-Tax Collector-Public Administrator, Clerk Recorder, and Sheriff-Coroner.
The proposed ordinance moves our county in the wrong direction with campaign finance reform and will exacerbate the public’s perception that money controls elections, further eroding the public’s confidence in our local elections. The LWV SLOCO urges the Board of Supervisors to reconsider the proposed cap of $25,000 to more closely align with the state’s limit of $4,700. This change would enhance the public’s trust and confidence in county elections and encourage citizens to participate in the political process.
Read County Ordinance 30.2 here or info [at] lwvslo.org (subject: Ordinance%2030.2) (email us).
WE URGE YOU TO CONTACT YOUR COUNTY SUPERVISOR TO REVISE DRAFT ORDINANCE 30.2 BY LOWERING THE $25,000 CONTRIBUTION CAP. The Ordinance will be on the Board's agenda on November 10th and November 17th.
How to Locate & Contact Your Board Supervisor
|(805) 781-4491||jpeschong [at] co.slo.ca.us||North County:
Templeton, Paso Robles, Shandon, San Miguel
|(805) 781-4338||bgibson [at] co.slo.ca.us||North Coast: San Simeon, Morro Bay, Los Osos/Baywood Park, Cambria, Cayucos, parts of San Luis Obispo|
|As this seat is vacant, please contact Lynn Compton, District 4||South County: Pismo Beach, Avila Beach, Shell Beach, Arroyo Grande, Grover Beach, parts of San Luis Obispo|
|(805) 781-4337||lcompton [at] co.slo.ca.us||South County: Nipomo, Oceano, Arroyo Grande|
|(805) 781-4339||darnold [at] co.slo.ca.us||North County: Atascadero, Santa Margarita, Creston, California Valley, parts of San Luis Obispo|
Letter Template for Your Board Supervisor
TO: County Board of Supervisors
DATE: November 7, 2020
RE: Proposed County Ordinance 30.2
November 10, 2020 Agenda, Consent Item #2
Dear Board of Supervisors:
I am writing to express my strong opposition to proposed County Ordinance 30.2 which would authorize a per-person campaign contribution limit of $25,000 on local elective county offices. I understand that this contribution cap will affect 10 county elected offices: Board of Supervisors (5), County Assessor, District Attorney, Auditor-Controller-Treasurer-Tax Collector-Public Administrator, Clerk Recorder, and Sheriff-Coroner.
A cap of $25,000 is excessive. It is five times the limit set by the California Political Reform Act (AB571), which is intended to curb undue influence and prevent corruption and the appearance of corruption. It is out of step with the size and small town/rural nature of our county.
The stated intent of the Ordinance itself is to “to encourage public confidence in the political process and to prevent corruption and the appearance of corruption by limiting the source and amount of contributions that may be made to candidates and committees controlled by candidates for county elective offices”. A contribution cap of $25,000 does the opposite. It discourages public confidence and contributes to the perception that public office can be “bought”. It will further erode confidence in our elections and in our democratic principles.
This is not the direction we should be going to restore confidence in local government and encourage public participation in the political process. I urge you to oppose this far too high cap on political contributions.