Explainers: Informed Voices Build Strong Communities
Examine the causes and consequences of public policy so we can engage thoughtfully, advocate effectively, and strengthen democracy in Franklin County.
Fair Election Districts Matter
Find out how they help make sure voters choose their representatives, not the other way around.
When districts are drawn unfairly, map‑drawers can use tactics like packing voters of one group into a few districts or cracking them across many districts, which creates “safe” seats where election outcomes are decided before anyone votes. In these cases, many votes are wasted because they cannot change the result, and elections become less competitive. This weakens democracy by reducing voter power and making representatives more accountable to map designers than to the people they serve.
Fair districts are made by following clear, nonpartisan rules instead of political goals. These rules include giving each district about the same number of people, keeping neighborhoods and communities with shared needs together, and drawing districts that are connected and reasonably shaped. Fair map‑drawing also avoids using party data or protecting incumbents and is often done through transparent, public processes so voters can see how decisions are made. /p>Read more on LWV website'
Ohio's Constitutional Right to Quality Public Education
Strengthen public schools or expand alternative private systems with public funding?
Ohio’s Constitutional Responsibility
The issue is not whether families should have choices. The question is whether Ohio should keep expanding separate publicly funded charter and private systems, or first fully fund the public school system required by the Ohio Constitution.
Ohio Constitution, Article VI, Section 2: “The General Assembly shall make such provisions, by taxation, or otherwise, as... will secure a thorough and efficient system of common schools throughout the state.”
This requirement has shaped decades of debate over public school funding, educational equity, property tax reliance, voucher programs, charter schools, public accountability, and academic standards. In theDeRolphcases, the Ohio Supreme Court found Ohio’s school funding system unconstitutional because of unequal reliance on local property taxes and disparities in educational opportunity.See DeRolph cases
Types of Schools, Public Funds, Standards, and Oversight
| Type of School | Use of Public Funds |
|---|---|
| Traditional Public Schools
• Serve all students • Provide transportation • Support students with disabilities • Support multilingual learners • Provide meals, counseling, and safety services |
Funded through state, local, and federal public dollars. • Operate under elected school boards • Follow public records laws • Follow open meeting laws • Operate under direct public financial oversight Academic Standards Required to administer state assessments and publish report card results. |
| Charter Schools / “Community Schools”
• Publicly funded • Tuition-free • Independently operated • May be managed by nonprofit or private organizations |
Receive public funding based largely on enrollment. • Operate through authorizers/sponsors • Transparency and governance requirements may differ from district schools • Staffing and financial oversight may vary Academic Standards May be subject to state testing and performance requirements, though implementation varies. |
| Private Schools Receiving Vouchers
• Privately operated • May receive public funding through vouchers • Often have greater curricular flexibility • May not be subject to the same enrollment obligations as public districts |
May receive public funds through voucher programs. • Public oversight is generally more limited • Often not subject to all public transparency laws • Governance structures differ from public districts Academic Standards May use different standards, assessments, or reporting systems than public schools. |
Perspectives in the Debate
| Public Education Support Perspective | Concerns About Diversion of Public Funds |
|---|---|
| Many advocates, parents, and community leaders argue that Ohio's first responsibility is to maintain and strengthen public education statewide.
• Schools cannot improve outcomes without stable and equitable funding. • Public education supports democracy, civic participation, and workforce development. • The Fair School Funding Plan was designed to address long-standing inequities and constitutional concerns. • Emphasizes equitable funding, transparency, accountability, statewide standards, and elected local governance. |
Critics argue that Ohio is creating a publicly funded parallel school system without consistently better academic outcomes.
• Public dollars should carry comparable public accountability requirements. • Public schools generally must administer state assessments, publish report cards, comply with open records laws, and operate under direct public oversight. • Some charter and private schools receiving taxpayer funds may operate under different or less transparent standards. • The debate centers on whether expanding alternatives diverts funding from Ohio's constitutional public education system. |
Constitutional Crisis
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris.
Immigration
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris.
SAVE America Act
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris.
Harnessing AI’s Power: Preserving Human Dignity, Opportunity, and Agency
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris.
How We Have an Impact Together
Principles, collaborations and achievements
The League of Women Voters (LWVUS) Advocates for Nonpartisan Studied Positions
LWVUS uses a federated, grassroots structure to advance policy through member-driven studies, consensus building and targeted advocacy.
We work across political lines and with partners and nongovernmental organizations to focus on solutions for urban, rural and suburban communities.
Want to Do More? Contact Policymakers
Facts matter. Personal experiences make them memorable. Share how an issue affects you, your family or your community.
Use the template to write in your own voice, find your elected officials and share your perspective.
Combat Mis/Disinformation → Trust Matters
Explore the challenges of navigating misinformation, disinformation and malinformation in today’s democratic landscape.
Learn strategies voters can use to identify reliable information and safeguard democratic processes.
Everyday Democracy
LWVMC members are everyday superheroes who safeguard democracy and change lives one voter at a time.
These true stories highlight members who go beyond the ordinary because helping voters matters.
Tell Us What Affects You in Franklin County → Together We Can Make Democracy Work
Our advocacy research starts with you.
The League encourages informed and active participation in government, builds understanding of public policy issues and influences policy through education and advocacy.
