Metro Columbus Public Education Analysis

Metro Columbus Public Education Analysis

Advocacy Tabs


Franklin County Divide & Automation → Pathways to Poverty


Franklin County Divide

Economically Disadvantaged vs. School Rating — Urban/Rural (top left) vs. Suburban (bottom right)

Chart: Economically Disadvantaged vs Performance Rating (Ohio districts)
Source: my.lwv.org — disadvantaged_versus_rating_2.jpg

Tip: Open image directly for maximum resolution.

Economic opportunites also limited in UR districts.

Automation pathways to poverty – fishbone diagramSimplified labels, all text wrapped to ~20 characters per line.Automation / AIIf unmitigatedPovertyPersistent PovertyJob DisplacementRural: machinesreplace farm workUrban: factory jobslost to automationWhere Jobs ClusterNew clusters insuburbs & metrosRural & urban coresfall behindWealth CaptureProfits go toowners ofinfrastructureWealth is untaxed,wages taxedPolicy GapsPublic good versusprivatizationImmigration forfilling skill gapsMiddle-skill jobsdisappearMore low-wage work,fewer middle pathsWage PolarizationSkills mismatchblocks good jobsLow pay, childcareand transport costsEducate & TrainHarder to organizeshort-term workersApp-controlledschedules and lackof benefits reducepayWeakened BargainingSafety-net gaps inUnemploymentInsurance, training,and childcareFunding instabilityfor local servicesPolicy Gaps

Policy FSFP vs HB 96 Formula


Impact Franklin County — HB96 vs FSFP Funding (By Group)


Risk Indicators by UR-SUB


District Enrollment Economically Disadvantaged (%) Chronically Absent (%) Suspended ≥1x (%) Third Grade Literacy (%) Juvenile Incarceration (per 1,000) DOPR in District?
1–3 ★ Districts
Columbus City 45,000 75% 48% 22% 38% 6.0 Yes
South-Western City 21,000 52% 32% 14% 52% 3.5 No / Nearby
Reynoldsburg City 10,500 51% 34% 15% 47% 3.8 No / Nearby
Westerville City 15,000 38% 28% 11% 58% 2.9 No / Nearby
Gahanna-Jefferson 8,000 35% 22% 10% 61% 2.5 No
Canal Winchester 4,800 37% 25% 12% 55% 3.0 No
Hamilton Local 3,500 58% 30% 14% 46% 4.2 No / Nearby
Whitehall City 3,400 74% 44% 20% 40% 5.5 Yes
Total (2–3 Star) ~111,000 ~55% ~36% ~15% ~49% ≈4.2 DOPR ≈ 3,000–4,000 countywide
4–5 ★ Districts
Hilliard City 16,000 32% 20% 9% 66% 1.5 No
Dublin City 16,500 19% 15% 6% 74% 0.9 No
Worthington City 10,000 27% 18% 8% 68% 1.2 No
Upper Arlington 6,000 10% 12% 5% 80% 0.5 No
Bexley City 2,300 12% 13% 4% 78% 0.6 No
Grandview Heights 1,100 14% 11% 4% 76% 0.7 No
New Albany–Plain Local 5,300 11% 13% 5% 79% 0.5 No
Olentangy Local (Franklin share) 8,000 8% 10% 3% 82% 0.4 No / Nearby
Total (4–5 Star) ~65,000 ~17% ~13% ~5% ~75% ≈0.8 No DOPR
Grand Total ~176,000 ~43% ~28% ~11% ~61% ≈2.5 DOPR ≈ 3,000–4,000 students countywide

Footnote:Dropout Prevention and Recovery (DOPR) schoolsare state-chartered public community schools authorized under ORC 3314.35 to serve students aged 16–21 who are credit-deficient, over-age, or previously dropped out. They focus on credit recovery, flexible scheduling, and re-engagement pathways toward high school graduation or equivalency.
Third Grade Literacy (%)= share of students reading proficiently by end of grade 3.
Juvenile Incarceration= estimated rate of youth from that district entering the juvenile justice system annually (per 1,000 students). Rates are approximate, derived from county-level data and district risk profiles.

Diversion: Ohio K-12 Funding & Voucher Snapshot (2024)


Diversion: Public Funding for Vouchers (Snapshot 2024)

Item 2024 Amount Share Key Details
Overall K-12 Funding
Total K-12 funding (State + Local + Federal) $26,000,000,000 100% State general fund & lottery + Local (property & income taxes) + Federal grants
Local taxpayers ≈ $13.0B ~50% Real estate & local income taxes
State taxpayers ≈ $9.6B ~37% State general revenue & lottery funds
Federal funds ≈ $3.4B ~13% Title programs, IDEA, nutrition & other grants
Voucher Programs (2024)
Programs EdChoice (Traditional), EdChoice Expansion, Autism, Jon Peterson, Cleveland Scholarships
EdChoice (Traditional) ≈ $271,000,000 Available broadly to public?(Yes — see ref)
EdChoice Expansion ≈ $405,000,000 Income-based sliding award; open to general public (no income limit; amount tapers with income)
Other vouchers (Autism, Jon Peterson, Cleveland) ≈ $290,000,000 Specialized eligibility (not general public)
EdChoice (Traditional) Details
Launch & eligibility (2024) Launched 2005; targeted to students assigned to low-performing schools; income threshold ≈ 450% FPL (family of 4 ≈ $140,400)
Participants (2024) ≈ 42,500 students Voucher amounts: $6,166 (K-8) and $8,408 (9-12)
EdChoice Expansion Details
Launch & structure Initiated 2023; no income cap; voucher value reduced ~linearly from 450%–750% FPL; above 750% FPL: $650 (K-8), $950 (9-12)
Participants (2024) ≈ 88,000 students Private school enrollment rose by ~3,700 → implies most recipients were already in private schools
Budget Interaction & Oversight
Source of voucher dollars Paid from the State’s general fund → directly competes with public-school funding (ref)
Growth dynamic EdChoice Expansion is fastest-growing; projected to consume a rising share of state K-12 funds
Accountability & equity Private schools accepting vouchers: limited state oversight of curriculum/testing; selective admissions may shift higher-cost needs to public schools (refs needed)
References – add links:
  • Ohio Department of Education & Workforce (ODEW) – School Funding & Report Card portals
  • Ohio Legislative Service Commission – Biennial Budget analyses (state GRF/lottery; voucher line items)
  • Ohio Dept. of Education – EdChoice & EdChoice Expansion program pages (eligibility, award amounts)
  • Autism Scholarship, Jon Peterson Special Needs, and Cleveland Scholarship program pages
  • Participation counts & enrollment changes: ODEW data releases (2023–2024)

Notes: Percent shares and dollar figures above reflect your provided 2024 estimates. Replace “refs needed” with specific URLs when finalized.

Research: Foundation Mentoring Type Program Successes


District Enrollment Economically Disadvantaged (%) Chronically Absent (%) Suspended ≥1x (%) Third Grade Literacy (%) Juvenile Incarceration (per 1,000) DOPR in District?
1–3 ★ Districts
Columbus City 45,000 75% 48% 22% 38% 6.0 Yes
South-Western City 21,000 52% 32% 14% 52% 3.5 No / Nearby
Reynoldsburg City 10,500 51% 34% 15% 47% 3.8 No / Nearby
Westerville City 15,000 38% 28% 11% 58% 2.9 No / Nearby
Gahanna-Jefferson 8,000 35% 22% 10% 61% 2.5 No
Canal Winchester 4,800 37% 25% 12% 55% 3.0 No
Hamilton Local 3,500 58% 30% 14% 46% 4.2 No / Nearby
Whitehall City 3,400 74% 44% 20% 40% 5.5 Yes
Total (2–3 Star) ~111,000 ~55% ~36% ~15% ~49% ≈4.2 DOPR ≈ 3,000–4,000 countywide
4–5 ★ Districts
Hilliard City 16,000 32% 20% 9% 66% 1.5 No
Dublin City 16,500 19% 15% 6% 74% 0.9 No
Worthington City 10,000 27% 18% 8% 68% 1.2 No
Upper Arlington 6,000 10% 12% 5% 80% 0.5 No
Bexley City 2,300 12% 13% 4% 78% 0.6 No
Grandview Heights 1,100 14% 11% 4% 76% 0.7 No
New Albany–Plain Local 5,300 11% 13% 5% 79% 0.5 No
Olentangy Local (Franklin share) 8,000 8% 10% 3% 82% 0.4 No / Nearby
Total (4–5 Star) ~65,000 ~17% ~13% ~5% ~75% ≈0.8 No DOPR
Grand Total ~176,000 ~43% ~28% ~11% ~61% ≈2.5 DOPR ≈ 3,000–4,000 students countywide

Footnote:Dropout Prevention and Recovery (DOPR) schoolsare state-chartered public community schools authorized under ORC 3314.35 to serve students aged 16–21 who are credit-deficient, over-age, or previously dropped out. They focus on credit recovery, flexible scheduling, and re-engagement pathways toward high school graduation or equivalency.
Third Grade Literacy (%)= share of students reading proficiently by end of grade 3.
Juvenile Incarceration= estimated rate of youth from that district entering the juvenile justice system annually (per 1,000 students). Rates are approximate, derived from county-level data and district risk profiles.

LWVMC Summary — HB 96 & FSFP


Education Advocacy: Impact of State Budget HB 96 vs Fair School Funding Plan Targets

Summary

  • Basis of analysis:Am. Sub. HB 96, 2025, using data from Legislative Services Commission and Department of Education and Workforce.
  • Purpose:Provides the background for LWV Metro Columbus members and allies for advocacy, panels, and testimonials.
  • Geographic focus:Metro Columbus (Franklin County School Districts).
  • Key framing:The Urban-Rural vs Suburban divide requires us to come together to help more students succeed. One way to do this is with 'Foundation Mentoring'.
  • Economic link:Connects improvements in 'Economically Disadvantaged' category of school funding to new economic activity in Franklin County.
  • Advocacy strategy:Proposes a strategy for advocacy and legislative action supported by a toolkit.

LWV Background

  • State position:LWVO advocates for full funding of public schools via the bipartisan Fair School Funding Plan, covering both instructional and non instructional (categorical) support.
  • LWVMC Education Position:The local 2024 study found non-instructional support needs are far greater in urban and rural districts than suburban ones.
    • Motivation:Can a physically or mentally traumatized child access learning in the classroom?
    • Gap:Programs like SNAP address hunger, but other identified needs in urban and rural populations are also critical for students to access education and these remain unmet.


LWVMC Board adopted (May 2024) the following local position using LWVO education position as a basis:

“Advocate a public education system (birth-12 grade) that adequately funds local school districts, empowering schools to develop solutions in cooperation with members of the community and partners. The desired outcome is to provide the services necessary for each student to effectively access a quality education and meet the conditions for teaching efficacy and achievement standards.”