Hilton Head Island-Bluffton Area Subscribed Articles

Hilton Head Island-Bluffton Area Subscribed Articles

Press Mention

The News & Observer

The House's Congressional plan is not one we can be enthusiastic about. Teague said she disagreed with the proposal to extend the 5th District into Richland County, noting that district has become dominated by the suburbs south of Charlotte, North Carolina, which is “a very different area.” The House plan for the 6th District also creates an unnecessary minority population imbalance,

Press Mention

The Post & Courier

The League of Women Voters was also critical of the new Congressional lines. Teague questioned the wisdom of including predominantly Black Charleston precincts with Columbia, more than 100 miles away. " We can keep communities of interest together and the House has not chosen to do that. "

Press Mention

The State newspaper

The LWVSC is not enthusiastic about the SC House's proposed  Congressional map because it doesn’t honor communities of interest. The plan significantly alters district lines in Richland County and the Lowcountry, but does so without addressing concerns about the amorphous 6th District, which still stretches from Columbia to Charleston. We believe they need a map that respects the communities of interest, and doing that will keep Charleston County whole.

People Powered Fair Maps logo
Blog Post

Today the SC House released their Congressional plan for public comment on that plan this Thursday. The Ad Hoc Committee will hear testimony on the House Staf Plan, the Senate Staff Plan, and any other submissions.

SC House and Senate maps have been approved by both houses and signed by the Governor. The League's final assessment is that the Senate map is a reasonable map in which the number of competitive districts is not reduced. The House plan is an extreme gerrymander with a very high level of incumbent protection. Only 15 House members voted against this plan.

Our SC voices will not be drowned out
Public Statement

Both the Senate and House maps are shaped in part by demographics that lead to many non-competitive districts in SC. The Senate map shows some effects from incumbent and partisan considerations. However, it is drawn with reasonable concern for communities of interest and it doesn’t reduce the number of competitive districts. However, the lack of competition that begins in population distributions is greatly amplified in the House map. This lack of competition is a very serious threat to representative democracy.

Lynn Teague, LWVSC VP for State Issues & Advocacy, at the SC Statehouse steps
Press Mention

SC Lede PODCAST, Part 2:
Continuation of conversation with Lynn Teague: potential congressional map changes, possible legal challenges, and what the State House could look like, especially since primaries will play more of a pivotal role.

Press Mention

The Post & Courier:
Under the SC Senate proposal, Congressional District 1 would represent the fewest Black residents of South Carolina’s seven seats. "The 1st Congressional District is the lone, naturally competitive seat, which the Senate proposal makes a GOP stronghold," Teague said.

Press Mention

Associated Press (AP):
South Carolina state senators approved new districts for the Senate and House Tuesday, but legal challenges are almost certain. “This lack of competition is a very serious threat to representative democracy. General election votes become meaningless because the outcome is certain, or nearly so,” Teague said.

Lynn Teague, LWVSC VP for State Issues & Advocacy, at the SC Statehouse steps
Press Mention

SC Lede PODCAST, Part 1:
An analysis of the current SC Senate and House redistricting maps before state lawmakers featuring Lynn Teague, VP Issues & Action,League of Women Voters of South Carolina.

Press Mention

The Post & Courier, December 1, 2021
BY THE EDITORIAL BOARD

Even when you bake in an expectation that the new election districts are going to ensure that Republicans continue to dominate the House for the next decade, their SC House proposal is beyond the pale. Yet when the League presented its findings to the House’s redistricting panel, no one asked a question or tried to dismiss the findings. Just silence. Which is astounding, given how astounding those numbers are. And embarrassing, since it suggests that House members don’t care how obvious their extreme partisanship is.

Pages