
LWVAC is launching a "What You Can Do" (WYCD) campaign where we share a series of action plans. With so much happening on the national stage, these action plans are intended to encourage you to respond to the daily breach of the rule of law and the separation of powers. Read more about this campaign here. Skip to the current action by clicking here.
CURRENT TOPIC: Reduction in NIH Funding for Medical Research
Fewer U.S. children are dying from cancer today than ever before. The same is true for U.S. men with prostate cancer and for women with breast cancer. The more than 70-year history of collaboration between the US government and the nation’s universities and other institutions is a major reason why more of us, young and old, are surviving and prospering into our 80s, 90s and sometimes even longer.
The present administration has now thrown this collaboration into chaos. The decision to limit the funding that research universities and hospitals use to fund equipment and supplies, maintain their research buildings and fund the personnel to monitor spending to guarantee that money is being spent carefully and lawfully has halted some research and made all researchers unsure of their ability to deliver the improved, safe, and effective evaluations and treatments they promised to the government and to the American people.
The temporary suspension of the administration’s actions in selected states only intensifies the chaos.
If you or people you know have survived cancer, traumatic brain injury, stroke, heart disease, diabetes, or other life-threatening disease, you and they did so because of medical research. Elected officials need to hear our stories of survival. They need to know that we want the same or even better outcomes for future generations.
If you or people you know are anxiously awaiting treatments for conditions now considered untreatable such as Alzheimer’s disease, then our elected officials need to know that abrupt, ill-considered disruptions in funding for medical research are unacceptable and could be politically risky at election time.
If you or people you know are being told that these disastrous funding decisions are going to save taxpayer money, elected officials need to know that thoughtful citizens do not believe it. Universities and other institutions affected by these reductions will have to limit or discontinue some essential services or those states who value health research will have to provide at least some portion of the funding. Or some institutions will either stop or severely limit medical research with the potential result that the cost of treating disease will increase. This administration’s thoughtless reduction in research funding will merely shift costs rather than reduce them, and taxpayers and the sick and disabled among them will still be responsible for covering these costs.
The White House has called resistance to the reductions in medical research funding “hysteria.” We need to let our representatives know that we are not hysterical. We are outraged. We are outraged because this cruel reduction in funding makes it less likely that future generations in North Central Florida will take hope from announcements like this:
UF Health is now the first site in the southeastern United States to house a groundbreaking device that will provide personalized cancer treatment by combining extremely detailed magnetic resonance imaging, or MRI, with precision radiotherapy. This has an incredible quality of life and economic impact, not just for the patients themselves, but also for our health care system as a whole.
CURRENT ACTION: Call your legislators and let them know how you feel and why.
Some suggestions for your message follow. We want our messages to be laser focused on threats to the NIH funding of medical research. Feel free to use some or all these suggestions translated into your own words. As always, be respectful and brief as possible.
Senator Ashley Moody: (202) 224-3041
Representative Kat Cammack: (202) 225-5744
Our goal is to let our elected representatives know we are outraged and determined:
- Describe your experience with an advanced medical treatment and why you want future generations to have the same or even better outcomes. Emphasize real-life outcomes like being able to drive to your polling place without assistance.
- Describe a friend or family’s similar experience.
- Describe your presently untreatable medical condition and your hope that well-supported medical research programs may discover treatments in time for you to benefit.
- Describe a family member or friend’s now untreatable condition and hope for the future.
- Make the argument that what is described as cost-cutting is most likely merely cost-shifting. The American taxpayer is still going to be on the hook if medical research is to continue.
- Tell them a story of your favorite university or other institution’s specific contributions to improved healthcare.
- Give them the data on Florida impacts with special emphasis on local effects in call to Representative Cammack, but be sure to emphasize that numbers are best estimates based on available data and that a specific amount is less important than the fact that these cuts will influence not only researchers but students and those in support roles such as clerical and maintenance, Further remind them that the communities surrounding these research organizations will also be affected: people losing jobs means less to spend at the grocery store.
- According to Doctor Gator, College of Medicine News, The UF College of Medicine achieved a new record of more than $ 169 million in NIH funding in 2023,and that the college now ranks 21st among public universities, up one spot from 2022.
- And from the same source: 2023 National Institutes of Health research funding placed three UF College of Medicine programs in the top 5 nationally among their respective programs and a total of 10 ranked in the top 20 among public institutions. For example, the Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery ranked second nationally with more than $20 million dollars in grants, the Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery combined ranked third in funding nationally with nearly $32 million in funding. The Department of Surgery ranked fifth in the nation with more than $18 million.
- The University of Florida reports that their indirect costs are 52.5%. The proposed reduction in indirect costs to 15% represents the potential loss of tens of millions of dollars for UF health researchers.
- The following data are from the South Florida Sun Sentinel. At Florida International University, where indirect costs of 55 NIH grants top 15%, $3 million used for research may be cut, including work on Alzheimer’s, teenage suicide and Parkinson’s disease.
- Also from the Sun Sentinel: at the University of Miami, $20 million may not be available to support over 300 NIH grants funding research into cancer, pot use by teens, dementia, and opioid addiction, among many other diseases and conditions.
- And finally, from the South Florida Sun Sentinel: The notion that nonprofits or donors will pick up the financial slack is absurd.