Ohio's Budget Widens the Urban–Rural/Suburban Divide, Foundational Mentoring Pays Dividends
Franklin County — Literacy, Graduation & Investment Summary
Focus: bridging the Urban–Rural (2–3★) and Suburban (4–5★) divide with literacy-first interventions and graduation targets.
What Franklin County Schools Need
| Metric | 2–3★ Urban–Rural UR |
4–5★ Suburban SUB |
Comments / Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Enrollment | 113,000 | 81,800 | Source:Ohio Report Card |
| Avg. Economically Disadvantaged | 68.20% | 19% | Disparity drives service intensity needed in UR. |
| Est. Not Reading at Grade 3(~33% statewide) | 3,240 | 2,348 | Franklin County ≈ 14–15k 3rd graders → ~4.6–5.0k not proficient. Non-proficient readers are ~4× more likely to drop out; dropouts ≈3× more likely to face incarceration/extreme interventions. |
| % At-Risk of Dropout (≈ 4×) | 810 | 587 | Estimate used for planning (actual youth incarcerated ~175 countywide, but dropout risk is a also key indicator). |
| Extreme Intervention Costs (per student ≈ $200k/yr) | $78,000,000 | $2,800,000 | Illustrative burden (drugs, incarceration, etc.); shows scale of reactive costs vs prevention. |
Note:Estimates are directional for advocacy planning and reflect known statewide relationships between early literacy, graduation, and justice involvement.
Graduation Gains & Economic Impact
| Metric | 2–3★ (UR) | 4–5★ (SUB) | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Graduation Rate | ~80% | ~95% | Pattern from ODE report cards (UR lower; SUB already ≈95%). |
| Graduates New (est.) | 90,400 | 77,710 | Enrollment × current grad rate (illustrative). |
| Graduates at 95% Target | 107,350 | 77,710 | Raises UR to 95%; SUB already ~95%. |
| Increase in Graduates | +16,950 | ≈ 0 | Gains are concentrated in 2–3★ districts. |
| Added Annual Economic Value (≈$15,000per additional graduate) | $254,250,000 / yr | $0 | Earnings + taxes + avoided social/corrections costs. |
| County Total (Annual) | ~$254,000,000 | Lifetime (~40 yrs):≈$10.2B | |
Economic increment uses a conservative average of ≈$15,000 per new graduate per year.
26–27 Biennium Funding vs FSFP
| Line Item | 2–3★ (UR) | 4–5★ (SUB) | Comments / Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Economic Disadvantage Funding | $422 per student | — | Not applicable to community-centered Foundational Mentoring; available to all students. |
| FSFP Shortfall (Total) | −$229,850,951 | −$22,400,895 | Assumes state fully funds districts; remaining burden shifts local. |
| FSFP Shortfall (Per Student) | ≈ $2,034 | ≈ $274 | Per-student shortfall = total shortfall ÷ district students. |
| Share Covered by State vs Levies | State ≈ 35%; Levies ≈ 65% | State ≈ 35%; Levies ≈ 65% | What can be raised varies by property values (2% in UA ≫ 2% in Columbus). |
| FSFP Shortfall Not Made Up by Levies | ? | ? | To fill in:county auditor + district levy receipts (2024). See: Franklin County Auditor & ODE District Profiles. |
Source links:Ohio Report Card, Franklin County Auditor (levy receipts), ODE District Profiles.
Foundation Mentoring — Investment Snapshot
Investment Need
- UR (2–3★) non-readers × $6,000 →$19.44M
- SUB (4–5★) non-readers × $6,000 →$14.088M
- Total:$33.528M
Why It Pays
- 3rd-grade literacy → 4× higher grad odds.
- New graduates add ≈$15,000/yr each in value.
- Reduces extreme interventions (≈$200k/youth/year).
- Increases economic activity by (≈$254,250,000per year; ≈$10.2Bover 40 yrs)
Advocacy Takeaways
The Ask
- preventive mentoring for all identified students.
- proactive mentoring identified by at-risk data.
- resource coordinator at each building to work within the community.
The goal is to provide students with mentoring that, in addition to the state's services, ensures follow through by connecting to the families and community.
Justification
- Funding gap is inequitable:2–3★ UR districts bear ~91% of the combined FSFP shortfall (−$229.9M of −$252.3M), ≈$1,760more shortfall per student than suburban peers (UR ≈$2,034vs SUB ≈$274).
- Limited local tax capacity magnifies the gap:FSFP shortfall per student is substantially higher in UR (≈$2,034) than SUB (≈$274), and levy capacity varies is less in UR districts.
- Higher UR student needs with lower in-school capacity:UR districts average68.2%economically disadvantaged students vs19%in suburban districts.
- Policy ask:Prevent diversion of public funds with vouchers for the wealthy and require standards for all publicly funded schools. This will help close the divide.
- Foundational Mentoring pays:Preventive investment (~$6,000/student) helps avoid extreme interventions (~$200,000/youth/year).
- Economic upside:Raising 2–3★ districts to 95% graduation adds ≈$254,250,000 per yearin countywide value (≈$10.2Bover 40 years).
- 📌 Franklin County pilot:Propose a countywide pilot program to establish clear metrics on Foundation Mentoring and graduation outcomes. This pilot would document avoided costs, track literacy and mentoring impacts, and provide evidence for scaling statewide investments.
Sources & Notes:Numbers are fromMetro Columbus Public Education Advocacyand the Ohio Report Card. Literacy→cost avoidance assumptions held constant across groups for comparability.
Sources
- Ohio Report Card — Enrollment & Performance
- Franklin County Auditor — Levy collections & rates (district receipts)
- ODE District Profiles (Cupp Reports) — Local revenue & funding mix
- Research on literacy → graduation → incarceration; Ohio youth cost ≈ $200k/youth/year (ODYS / Policy Matters)
- Metro Columbus Public Education Advocacy
| State stance | Impact |
|---|---|
| State underfunds FSFP yet claims it is supporting the funding formula by using 2023 costs. | Shortchanging schools shifts the burden to families through higher property taxes, rents, and sales taxes. Low-wealth districts raise far less, so kids in poorer communities get less even when voters say “yes.” |
| “We can’t afford FSFP.” | The gap is only $2.5 billion—small compared to Ohio’s budget. Instead, funds go to vouchers and incarceration rather than classrooms. |
| Vouchers should help low-income families in failing schools. | In 2023–24, over $400 million went to EdChoice Expansion, mostly for wealthier families. Less than 20% of recipients are low-income. |
| “Parental choice” expands opportunities. | 78% of students attend public schools, and in nine counties they are the only choice. Vouchers drain funds from the system serving most kids. |
| State support for education is stable. | Repeated state income tax cuts shift the burden to local property taxes. Low-wealth districts fall further behind. |
| The system is accountable to communities. | School boards are becoming more accountable to state politicians, not local voters. Community voice is diminished. |
| No money for full school funding. | Lawmakers approved a $600M subsidy for the Browns stadium while cutting school support. Stadium jobs are temporary; education builds futures. |
| School choice drives improvement. | Diverting funds to unaccountable alternatives weakens public schools. Private schools receiving vouchers must be held to state standards. |
| Federal support can fill the gap. | Federal aid is unstable and likely to decline. Ohio must invest directly in its schools. |
| “Flat taxes are fair because everyone pays the same rate.” | Flat(er) taxes shift the load to sales and property taxes, which are regressive. Poorer families pay more of their income than the wealthy. |
| “Local control is better; just pass a levy.” | Levies raise far less in low-wealth areas for the same millage. This isn’t local control—it’s structural inequality. |
| Governance principles for a public education system are being met. | Wealthy districts use loopholes to avoid open enrollment from poorer districts. State control is eroding true school board independence. |
What Franklin County Schoools need
| Metric | 2–3★ Urban–Rural UR |
4–5★ Suburban SUB |
Comments / Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total enrollment | 113,000 | 81,800 | https://reportcard.education.ohio.gov/home |
| Avg. Economically Disadvantaged | 68.20% | 19% | |
| Est. Not Reading (Statewide ~33% of 3rd graders) | 3,240 | 2,348 | Franklin County estimate: ~14,000–15,000 3rd graders, so ~4,600–5,000 not proficient. A 3rd grader who is not proficient in reading is 4× more likely to drop out, and high school dropouts are 3× more likely to be incarcerated. |
| % At-Risk of Dropout (≈4×) | 810 | 587 | Actual number incarcerated is 175, but we are using this estimate because: A 3rd grader not proficient in reading is 4× more likely to drop out, and high school dropouts are 3× more likely to or need extreme interventions or be incarcerated. |
| "Extreme intervention costs (drugs, incarceration etc. per student ~$200,000/year)." |
$78,000,000.00 | $2,800,000.00 | $80,800,000.00 |
| Current graduateion rates. | 80 | 95 | 2-3* is at 80%; 4-5* is at 95% |
| Additional graduations due to Foundation Mentoring | 16950 | 0 | |
| Economic Gains due to state investment in the divide |
Act Now
Browse activities and add your voice
| Activity | Issue |
|---|---|
| LWV METRO COLUMBUS | |
| None |
No active alerts
Metro Columbus actions will appear here when available.
|
| LWVO | |
| Tell Ohio lawmakers |
Put people before party in redistricting
Fair maps ensure communities choose their representatives, not the other way around. It directly affects who sets education policy and funding priorities.
|
| LWVUS | |
| Tell Congress |
Protect our voting rights
Strong voting rights protect accountability for school funding, transparency, and district governance.
|
| ALLIES | |
| None |
No active alerts
Partner organization alerts will be listed here when available.
|
Key Explainers
Context, solutions, and actions
The Problem We Must Solve Together
Franklin County highlights Ohio’s UR vs. SUB divide.
2–3★ urban–rural districts carry higher concentrations of poverty and lower graduation rates; 4–5★ suburban districts are near 95% graduation. Equalizing opportunity requires targeted, sustained supports.
Why Early Supports & Community Connectedness Work
Reading, tutoring, attendance, and mentoring lift graduation.
Early literacy, high-dosage tutoring, attendance and mental-health supports are most effective when paired with mentors, family engagement, and after-school or work-based learning.
FSFP: State Stance vs. Impact
Outdated costs and voucher growth strain district budgets.
Using older cost inputs underfunds schools; shortfalls are shifted to local levies. Voucher expansion diverts funds while fixed costs remain, especially in high-need districts.
Our Impact
Collaboration, outreach, and action tools
The Role of Non-Partisan Collaboration
Bipartisan cooperation gets funding to what works.
We convene urban, rural, and suburban partners; work across political lines; and keep focus on proven interventions that raise graduation rates and reduce long-term costs.
Send Emails to Legislators
Use targeted messages to support full FSFP funding.
Make your voice heard. Explain how fully funding the “economically disadvantaged” component helps schools deliver literacy, mentoring, and attendance supports that boost graduation.
Measure What Matters
Track literacy, attendance, and graduation outcomes.
Use simple indicators tied to prevention mentoring: K–3 literacy gains, attendance improvements, grade progression, and cohort graduation rates.
From Students to Skilled Workers: Increasing Economic Activity
Public Education Advocacy Strategy
Advocate: Inform with Trusted Information
|
Work for Democracy: Volunteer for Voter Outreach Actions
|
Be a Member: Learn How We Fight For Democracy
|
Honor Civic Contributions: Democracy In Action
|
Calendar
SignUp for Events
Please use the eVoter emails to access current information and signUp!
Franklin County Divide
Economically Disadvantaged vs. School Rating illustrating the Urban-Rural (top left) / Suburban (bottom right) divide

Tip: Open image directly for maximum resolution.




