All South Carolina Articles

Shayna Howell
Press Mention

Guest Essay, The Post & Courier

Voters in South Carolina’s 1st Congressional District have been envied for the past 10 years: they had the distinction of having a choice in the general election. They could — and indeed did — elect both Republican and Democratic congressional leaders, fostering competition that steered candidates of both parties away from hyperpartisanship. Meanwhile, the six other congressional seats in South Carolina — five Republican and one Democratic — were won by margins often exceeding 20%.

Unfortunately, if the S.C. Legislature passes its proposed redistricting maps when lawmakers come back for votes this week and next, South Carolina’s only competitive congressional seat will be gerrymandered out of voters’ control.

Nancy L. Williams, LWVSC President
Press Mention

Guest Essay: The Island Packet/Beaufort Gazettte

Maps drawn for the state’s 124 House districts and our seven Congressional districts are gerrymandered to protect incumbents of both parties and to advantage the current political party in power. 

Proposed Congressional maps eliminate the only naturally competitive district in the state in their reallocation of voters in Congressional District 1. It would make more sense - as the League’s proposed map recommends - to keep Charleston whole and make Beaufort County a part of a realigned District 2 which includes Jasper County, with which Beaufort County shares regional economic interests. This alignment would restore Congressional District 1’s competitiveness.

People Powered Fair Maps logo
Blog Post

The Senate has released their staff proposal for Congressional Districts, and will meet Monday, November 29. In contrast to the Senate plan for Senate districts, which moved in a positive direction toward greater preservation of communities of interest, the Congressional plan does not. Analysis rates the proposal “very bad” on competitiveness and proportionality, “ok” rating on minorities, and “bad” on compactness and splitting.

Press Mention

The fix has been in by members of the S.C. House for a long time. For months, they’ve been actors in a theatrical drama of their own creation to make it look like newly redrawn voting districts are fair.

People Powered Fair Maps logo
Blog Post

We are concerned that neither house has released a Congressional plan for public comment. This is especially disturbing because the House has now scheduled a return of the full body for floor debate on redistricting on December 1, 2, and 6. There is little time left.

The House Redistricting Ad Hoc Committee met again and forwarded their plan to the full House Judiciary, which met the same day. The plan was “tweaked” with a series of amendments. The House has not announced any opportunity for public comment on the amended proposal, but we can summarize the League’s evaluation here.

Press Mention

South Carolina’s House redistricting panel could advance a voting map proposal this week, roughly a week after taking public testimony on its plan. Dozens of residents, advocacy organizations, and Democratic party officials have weighed in on the proposal since it was released earlier this month, with many raising concerns about how lines were drawn and the way lawmakers have conducted the once-a-decade process of ensuring all districts have equivalent populations.

Proposed SC House Map: Extreme Gerrymander
News

Proposed SC House maps appear to be an extreme partisan gerrymander. If these maps pass, they will lead to the disenfranchisement of thousands of voters. Major communities of interest are divided, hundreds of precincts are split, and there are even fewer competitive districts.

People Powered Fair Maps logo
Blog Post

The League found that the proposed SC Senate map is in most respects reasonable and fair to the citizens of the state. We have concerns about the effects of the growth of Lowcountry suburbs on districts that have long been heavily minority and rural, especially District 39, but we don’t ask for revision that would lead to “packing” that or any other district.

We found the proposed SC House plan to be an extreme gerrymander, highly protective of incumbents, and extremely non-competitive. With more than 41,000 residents in each district, this means that the House plan would unnecessarily deprive more than a quarter million South Carolinians of the right to be represented by someone that they choose in the November general elections. The damaging impacts would be felt by voters who identify with both major parties.

It is important for everyone to remain engaged in this process. We are a long way from the finish line.

SC map proposal
Press Mention

The proposed SC Senate map reveals little gerrymandering bias. However, League concerns about the map proposed by the House Redistricting Committee are broader. The draft House map produces only 12 districts in which the partisan lean margin is considered competitive. This map also fails to respect genuine and important communities of interest. Finally, analysis using widely accepted redistricting mathematical evaluation methods shows that the House map displays extreme bias.

People Powered Fair Maps logo
Testimony

Substantial population growth along the coast and south of Charlotte, accompanied by population stagnation in the I-95 corridor, requires adjustments of district boundaries, in particular boundaries associated with Congressional District (CD) 1 and CD 6. However, at present CD 6 has a very high percentage of minority voters, especially when minorities smaller than our Black population are considered. The current minority margin can and should be reduced. We believe that the best way to achieve this is to focus CD 6 on the Midlands and upper Lowcountry, withdrawing it from the Charleston area.

Pages