When the South Carolina Senate’s redistricting committee released renderings of its proposed new map earlier in November, the results were met with a collective easy shrug by lawmakers and members of the public alike. Advocacy groups closely monitoring the process — the American Civil Liberties Union, the South Carolina League of Women Voters — offered little objection.
Meeting to discuss the maps for the first time on Nov. 10, the eight members of the House redistricting committee faced several hours of constituent testimony and criticism that the 124 districts — as drawn — discouraged competition, divided communities of interest, and were released with insufficient time to allow for informed public comment.